Right now the Design quality review group is empty. We need it to have people, as we are facing several designs coming down the pike.
My proposal
To match prior practice, I propose that we initialize the group to the set of people with formal design training who DRI’ed design efforts in the past. Formally, this means that I nominate @mbernst, @karolina, @christopher.diemert, and @varis. If I am missing somebody, please let me know! (By the way @markwhiting, my reading on the gov docs is that someone can self-nominate for a position: "To gain these privileges, the person must be nominated by a member of the Collective". Do we want to allow self nomination, like I'm doing here?)
Nomination paragraphs:
@mbernst has led multiple design efforts and design reviews on the site over the past few years. This includes multiple design review passes with @dmorina on the task feed, authoring page, results review, and homepage.
@karolina crafted the overall design language of the site, including final color scheme, and several graphics for the papers and the site.
@christopher.diemert was very active early on designing elements such as (IIRC) the logo, task feed, early color schemes, and aspects of the homepage.
@varis led a redesign of the authoring environment and review page.
Use comments to share your response or use emoji 👍 to show your support. To officially join in, add yourself as an assignee to the proposal. To break consensus, comment using this template. To find out more about this process, read the how-to.
Right now the Design quality review group is empty. We need it to have people, as we are facing several designs coming down the pike.
My proposal
To match prior practice, I propose that we initialize the group to the set of people with formal design training who DRI’ed design efforts in the past. Formally, this means that I nominate @mbernst, @karolina, @christopher.diemert, and @varis. If I am missing somebody, please let me know! (By the way @markwhiting, my reading on the gov docs is that someone can self-nominate for a position: "To gain these privileges, the person must be nominated by a member of the Collective". Do we want to allow self nomination, like I'm doing here?)
Nomination paragraphs:
@mbernst has led multiple design efforts and design reviews on the site over the past few years. This includes multiple design review passes with @dmorina on the task feed, authoring page, results review, and homepage.
@karolina crafted the overall design language of the site, including final color scheme, and several graphics for the papers and the site.
@christopher.diemert was very active early on designing elements such as (IIRC) the logo, task feed, early color schemes, and aspects of the homepage.
@varis led a redesign of the authoring environment and review page.
Use comments to share your response or use emoji 👍 to show your support. To officially join in, add yourself as an assignee to the proposal. To break consensus, comment using this template. To find out more about this process, read the how-to.