Skip to content

Conversation

@munificent
Copy link
Member

This situation rarely occurs in practice, since users typically put the comment before the metadata too (which is why we never noticed this bug until now).

But if it does occur, it's definitely wrong to force the return type to split unnecessarily.

This situation rarely occurs in practice, since users typically put the
comment before the metadata too (which is why we never noticed this bug
until now).

But if it does occur, it's definitely wrong to force the return type to
split unnecessarily.
@munificent munificent merged commit 63caad3 into main Oct 15, 2024
7 checks passed
@munificent munificent deleted the comment-after-metadata branch October 15, 2024 00:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants