Skip to content

Conversation

@munificent
Copy link
Member

This covers half of #1772, but I'll leave that open until primary constructors are implemented too so that I can ensure that we can format declaring field parameters as well.

It looks like the parser already allows private named parameters (the error is reported later in semantic analysis) so it's working without any formatter changes.

This covers half of #1772, but I'll leave that open until primary
constructors are implemented too so that I can ensure that we can format
declaring field parameters as well.
@munificent munificent requested a review from kallentu November 18, 2025 00:40
Copy link
Member

@kallentu kallentu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@munificent munificent merged commit f9825b8 into main Nov 18, 2025
7 checks passed
@munificent munificent deleted the format-private-named-initializing-formals branch November 18, 2025 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants