Skip to content

Add generic type aliases to dartdoc #2499

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jcollins-g opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2584
Closed

Add generic type aliases to dartdoc #2499

jcollins-g opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2584
Assignees
Labels
P0 A serious issue requiring immediate resolution type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@jcollins-g
Copy link
Contributor

There is now sufficient implementation in top of tree analyzer that we can do this.

@jcollins-g jcollins-g added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug P0 A serious issue requiring immediate resolution labels Feb 2, 2021
@jcollins-g jcollins-g self-assigned this Feb 2, 2021
@jcollins-g jcollins-g added the status-blocked Blocked from making progress by another (referenced) issue label Feb 11, 2021
@jcollins-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

Landing this is blocked on #2500, which is in itself blocked on getting build, glob, and dart_style working well with the new analyzer. In a private branch however most of the implementation is complete.

See also dart-lang/sdk#44960.

@parlough
Copy link
Member

@jcollins-g If you want to open a draft PR with the in progress changes, I'd be happy to take a preliminary look!

@jcollins-g jcollins-g removed the status-blocked Blocked from making progress by another (referenced) issue label Feb 18, 2021
@jcollins-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will be swinging back around to this feature shortly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P0 A serious issue requiring immediate resolution type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants