Skip to content

Adjust NNBD_TOP_MERGE such that void does not prevail #824

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
eernstg wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Adjust NNBD_TOP_MERGE such that void does not prevail #824

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions accepted/future-releases/nnbd/feature-specification.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Status: Draft

## CHANGELOG

2020.02.07
- Adjust `NNBD_TOP_MERGE` such that `void` doesn't prevail over `Object?`
and `dynamic`.

2020.01.31
- Specify that mixins must not have uninitialized potentially non-nullable
non-late fields, and nor must classes with no generative constructors.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1064,13 +1068,13 @@ as:
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object?, Object?) = Object?`
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(dynamic, dynamic) = dynamic`
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(void, void) = void`
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object?, void) = void`
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object?, void) = Object?`
- And the reverse
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(dynamic, void) = void`
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(dynamic, void) = dynamic`
- And the reverse
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object?, dynamic) = Object?`
- And the reverse
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object*, void) = void`
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object*, void) = Object?`
- And the reverse
- `NNBD_TOP_MERGE(Object*, dynamic) = Object?`
- And the reverse
Expand Down