Skip to content

cyclic_default_values_test stack overflows during resolution #26785

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
jmesserly opened this issue Jun 28, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

cyclic_default_values_test stack overflows during resolution #26785

jmesserly opened this issue Jun 28, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior)

Comments

@jmesserly
Copy link

Just caught this testing DDC against latest Analyzer. Seems likely to be caused by #25794 fix.
@jmesserly jmesserly added legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. analyzer-strong-mode P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior) labels Jun 28, 2016
@jmesserly
Copy link
Author

jmesserly commented Jun 28, 2016 •
edited
Loading

(I'm a bit surprised by a stack overflow though, as we don't do anything recursive. What I'd expect is that inference would just not work for one of the two functions. edit: that wouldn't be correct behavior either, but it would be a bit less problematic.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jmesserly