Closed
Description
@jensjoha @munificent
This code:
void f() {
try {
f();
} on int {
} on (int, int) {
}
}is parsed as try/catch followed by a local function declaration.
Not as as two catch clauses with a record type annotation.
Might be an ambiguity in the grammar?
CompilationUnit
declarations
FunctionDeclaration
returnType: NamedType
name: SimpleIdentifier
token: void
name: f
functionExpression: FunctionExpression
parameters: FormalParameterList
leftParenthesis: (
rightParenthesis: )
body: BlockFunctionBody
block: Block
leftBracket: {
statements
TryStatement
tryKeyword: try
body: Block
leftBracket: {
statements
ExpressionStatement
expression: MethodInvocation
methodName: SimpleIdentifier
token: f
argumentList: ArgumentList
leftParenthesis: (
rightParenthesis: )
semicolon: ;
rightBracket: }
catchClauses
CatchClause
onKeyword: on
exceptionType: NamedType
name: SimpleIdentifier
token: int
body: Block
leftBracket: {
rightBracket: }
FunctionDeclarationStatement
functionDeclaration: FunctionDeclaration
name: on
functionExpression: FunctionExpression
parameters: FormalParameterList
leftParenthesis: (
parameter: SimpleFormalParameter
name: int
parameter: SimpleFormalParameter
name: int
rightParenthesis: )
body: BlockFunctionBody
block: Block
leftBracket: {
rightBracket: }
rightBracket: }