Skip to content

[macros] evaluate support for prefer_const_constructors #59467

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
Tracked by #59399
pq opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #59399

[macros] evaluate support for prefer_const_constructors #59467

pq opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@pq
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. linter-new-language-feature linter-set-flutter P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on

Comments

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented May 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

No description provided.

@pq pq mentioned this issue May 8, 2024
Open
@pq pq self-assigned this May 8, 2024
@pq pq added P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on linter-new-language-feature linter-false-positive and removed linter-set-flutter labels May 8, 2024
@pq pq changed the title [macros] support for prefer_const_constructors [macros] evaluate support for prefer_const_constructors May 8, 2024
@pq pq closed this as completed May 8, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew added devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Nov 20, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew transferred this issue from dart-archive/linter Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pq pq

Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. linter-new-language-feature linter-set-flutter P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pq @devoncarew