Skip to content

Add data interchange section, using DLPack #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 22, 2020
Merged

Add data interchange section, using DLPack #34

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 22, 2020

Conversation

rgommers
Copy link
Member

@rgommers rgommers commented Sep 8, 2020

This is incomplete, but there seems to be agreement that DLPack is the best candidate for an interchange mechanism. So let's document that, and improve the content as we go.

See data-apis/consortium-feedback#1 for the RFC about standardizing on DLPack. Design discussion should be picked up there.

This is incomplete, but there seems to be agreement that DLPack
is the best candidate for an interchange mechanism. So let's
document that, and improve the content as we go.

See data-apis/consortium-feedback#1
for the RFC about standardizing on DLPack. Design discussion
should be picked up there.
@rgommers
Copy link
Member Author

What's in here is useful, and what's missing is denoted by TODO, so I'll merge this as is.

@rgommers rgommers merged commit 9ef5b5d into master Oct 22, 2020
@rgommers rgommers deleted the dlpack branch October 22, 2020 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants