DEBUG_DEPTH not working

[anishkny]

DEBUG_DEPTH env var has no effect. I tried values of 10, 100, null. No matter what I always get the following display:

2020-02-08T22:17:01.423Z SCOPE STRING [ { email: 'xxx@yyy.com', vars: [ [Object] ] } ]

My invocation:

debug('STRING', targetObj);

[chriskinsman]

Noticed this also. Looks like it is defaulting to 3 and not allowing an override...

Any fix in the works?

[Qix-]

Yep looks like a regression somewhere.

[Qix-]

Can you test with npm i --no-save visionmedia/debug#fix/depth?

[Qix-]

Started down the git blame rabbit hole. If that branch fixes it, then this has been broken for years. Amazing.

[anishkny]

Looks like fix is effective. Any place to add unit tests for this?

I should have noted it reproduces only when deep object is the second argument to the debug function, e.g.

// index.js
require('debug')('FOO')('something', {
  x: 1,
  y: { a: 2, b: 3, c: { a: 1, b: { a: 1, b: { a: 1, b: { a: 1 } } } } },
});

Before fix:

$ DEBUG=FOO DEBUG_DEPTH=40 node index.js
  FOO something { x: 1, y: { a: 2, b: 3, c: { a: 1, b: [Object] } } } +0ms

After fix:

$ DEBUG=FOO DEBUG_DEPTH=40 node index.js
  FOO something {
  x: 1,
  y: {
    a: 2,
    b: 3,
    c: {
      a: 1,
      b: { a: 1, b: { a: 1, b: { a: 1 } } }
    }
  }
} +0ms

[Qix-]

I should have noted it reproduces only when deep object is the second argument to the debug function, e.g.

Yeah that's much less simple to fix; there are a few bugs surrounding this. v5 is going to be a rewrite for the most part, so a lot of this will get addressed then.

Glad to know it works now (mostly); I'll commit it in sometime soon. Thank you very much for testing @anishkny :)

[sylver]

What is the status on this issue ?

I noticed it recently in our production container, but that's a bit more tricky since I can't reproduce the problem locally.

Same value of DEBUG_DEPTH in both case (10).
Trying to decrement or increment it locally seems to produce the expected effect, while any value in our container does nothing (looks like it's stucked to 3), so I'm guessing something else is interfering but I wasn't able to find out what yet.

[Qix-]

What is the status on this issue?

[sylver]

@Qix- very useful & constructive, thanks.

Since you clearly need me to clarify my question:

Giving this issue is opened for more than a year, and no news since Jul 9, 2020, would you be so kind to provide some update on its resolution ?

Thanks

[Qix-]

There is no update.

[sylver]

@Qix- Thanks.

Thing is, you apparently already had a fix a year ago and stated in the last update on this issue :

[...] I'll commit it in sometime soon.

I'm wondering what's holding you back for so long and if the project is still maintained.
Do you or any maintainer on the project would need any help to make it happen ?