Skip to content

Conversation

@ncopa
Copy link
Contributor

@ncopa ncopa commented Sep 23, 2024

Introduce loongarch64

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Sep 23, 2024

As noted in #16404 (comment), this unfortunately isn't something we can/will support currently. We're happy to accept the image refresh, but the Loongson architecture will need to be dropped from it. Thanks!

algitbot pushed a commit to alpinelinux/aports that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
Docker not support loongarch64 yet, so we need to build the alpine base
image ourself.

See docker-library/official-images#17607
@xen0n
Copy link

xen0n commented Nov 21, 2024

Hi, I'm an individual LoongArch porter who has recently been notified of the loong64 support situation as mentioned above. In order to move forward and unblock things such as linux-loongarch64-musl support for this .NET SDK unofficial distribution I've been working on lately, would it be okay to distribute the linux/loong64 Alpine images under another Docker Hub account or another container registry altogether, and preferably linking to the alternate location from various doc pages?

@ncopa
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncopa commented Dec 4, 2024

would it be okay to distribute the linux/loong64 Alpine images under another Docker Hub account or another container registry altogether, and preferably linking to the alternate location from various doc pages?

This is exactly the thing I want avoid.

@ncopa ncopa closed this Dec 5, 2024
@ncopa ncopa mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
@ncopa ncopa deleted the alpine-20240923 branch December 5, 2024 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants