Skip to content

Would a Stretch flavor be possible? #104

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jrabbit opened this issue Apr 24, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Would a Stretch flavor be possible? #104

jrabbit opened this issue Apr 24, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@jrabbit
Copy link

jrabbit commented Apr 24, 2016

I was using python:2.7-slim with stretch for a while and got hit by a version incompatibility b/t gnupg and taskd without a non-aptitude type solution.

@yosifkit
Copy link
Member

I think that right now Debian Stretch is too early in the cycle to promote as a stable base for language stacks. Since you are already using slim, have you tried the python:2.7-alpine version? It usually has newer packages to install (though it may require using the edge apk repository).

@gcbirzan
Copy link

gcbirzan commented May 2, 2017

This should probably be revised, now that Stretch is frozen.

@SpoonMeiser
Copy link

I would like to see a 2.7 stretch image too; we can't use the alpine images because they are incompatible with manylinux1 wheels.

@daveisfera
Copy link

The list is of options is starting to get long, but what are the thoughts on having a slim variant based on stretch?

@yosifkit
Copy link
Member

We do have stretch based images for 2.7, 3.6, and 3.7 (#215). As for slim variant of stretch, we'll track that in #219.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants