Skip to content

Bump to mono/2017-10/56195c0c and remove linker exclusions in corlib tests #999

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2017

Conversation

akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

I added tests for the *Attributes which were linked away in mono/mono@5a5ab38 so we should be able to remove the linker exclusions now.

@akoeplinger akoeplinger added the full-mono-integration-build For PRs; run a full build (~6-10h for mono bumps), not the faster PR subset (~2h for mono bumps) label Nov 2, 2017
@akoeplinger akoeplinger force-pushed the remove-linker-exclusions branch from cc6ecd8 to 1d2118a Compare November 2, 2017 13:28
…tests

I added tests for the *Attributes which were linked away to mono
in mono/mono@5a5ab38
so we should be able to remove the linker exclusions now.
@akoeplinger akoeplinger force-pushed the remove-linker-exclusions branch from 1d2118a to 1e018b3 Compare November 3, 2017 16:38
@akoeplinger akoeplinger changed the title Bump to mono/2017-10/5a5ab38 and remove linker exclusions in corlib tests Bump to mono/2017-10/56195c0c and remove linker exclusions in corlib tests Nov 3, 2017
@jonpryor jonpryor merged commit 8448a43 into dotnet:master Nov 4, 2017
@akoeplinger akoeplinger deleted the remove-linker-exclusions branch November 4, 2017 00:34
@jonpryor
Copy link
Member

jonpryor commented Nov 4, 2017

@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member Author

@jonpryor no I think that could be a different issue, but thanks for reminding me. I'll take a look :)

jonpryor added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2022
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#335
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#954
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#976
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#981
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#992

Changes: dotnet/java-interop@7716ae5...c942ab6

  * dotnet/java-interop@c942ab68: [java-source-utils] Build one `$(TargetFramework)` (#1007)
  * dotnet/java-interop@b7caa788: [Byecode] Hide `internal` Kotlin fields marked with `@JvmField` (#1004)
  * dotnet/java-interop@22d5687b: [generator] Add `@managedOverride` values `none` and `reabstract`. (#1000)
  * dotnet/java-interop@7f1d2d7a: [generator] Fix <remove-attr/> metadata (#999)
  * dotnet/java-interop@265ad762: [Java.Interop.Tools.JavaSource] Fix tag parsing errors (#997)
  * dotnet/java-interop@99c68a86: [Java.Interop] JniTypeSignature & CultureInfo, empty strings (#1002)
  * dotnet/java-interop@920ea648: [Java.Interop] optimize JniTypeManager.AssertSimpleReference() (#1001)
  * dotnet/java-interop@4b4fedd3: [generator] Process Javadoc for nested types (#996)

Ever since commit 2197a45, CI builds for the `main` branch have been
incredibly flakey: 918613d through 27647d2 all failed to complete
the **Mac** stage -- which *must* pass in order for most unit tests
to run -- then dbadf13 built, then f149c25 failed.

Nine commits in the past week have failed to adequately build.
(PR builds, meanwhile, were largely fine.)

Most of these failures are from `make all-tests`:

	_ExtractJavadocsFromJavaSourceJars:
	  /Users/runner/android-toolchain/jdk-11/bin/java -jar /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/bin/Release/lib/xamarin.android/xbuild/Xamarin/Android/java-source-utils.jar @/var/folders/24/8k48jl6d249_n_qfxwsl6xvm0000gn/T/tmp1cf0947e.tmp 
	JAVASOURCEUTILS : warning : Invalid or corrupt jarfile /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/bin/Release/lib/xamarin.android/xbuild/Xamarin/Android/java-source-utils.jar [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests.csproj]
	…
	BINDINGSGENERATOR : warning BG8600: Invalid XML file '/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests/obj/Release/javadoc-xamarin-test-sources-F6F5170BF7A8BC71.xml': Could not find file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests/obj/Release/javadoc-xamarin-test-sources-F6F5170BF7A8BC71.xml".  For details, see verbose output. [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not find file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.McwGen-Tests/obj/Release/javadoc-xamarin-test-sources-F6F5170BF7A8BC71.xml"
	…
	"/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/Xamarin.Android-Tests.sln" (default target) (1:2) ->
	"/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj" (default target) (12:6) ->
	(CoreCompile target) -> 
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(78,37): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'FromNode' and no accessible extension method 'FromNode' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(79,40): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'FromChannel' and no accessible extension method 'FromChannel' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(80,40): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'PayloadType' and no accessible extension method 'PayloadType' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(81,28): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'Payload' and no accessible extension method 'Payload' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(82,29): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'Payload' and no accessible extension method 'Payload' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(84,51): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'Payload' and no accessible extension method 'Payload' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]
	  /Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/BindingTests.cs(85,10): error CS1061: 'DataEventArgs' does not contain a definition for 'Payload' and no accessible extension method 'Payload' accepting a first argument of type 'DataEventArgs' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/tests/CodeGen-Binding/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests/Xamarin.Android.JcwGen-Tests.csproj]

`java-source-utils.jar` is (apparently) corrupt, so
`javadoc-xamarin-test-sources-F6F5170BF7A8BC71.xml` is never created,
which means no parameter name information is present, which means the
generated `DataEventArgs` type doesn't have the appropriate property
names, as the property names come from parameter names, and since we
don't have parameter names we instead have property names like `P0`,
`P1`, `P2`, etc.

Why, then, is `java-source-utils.jar` corrupt?  The current guess is
that it is being built *concurrently*; from a
`msbuild-20220706T175333-leeroy-all.binlog` build log file from one
of the offending builds, we see:

	17:53:44.526 59:11>Target "_BuildJava: (TargetId:490)" in file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/external/Java.Interop/tools/java-source-utils/java-source-utils.targets" from project "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/external/Java.Interop/tools/java-source-utils/java-source-utils.csproj" (entry point):
	17:53:44.526 59:11>Building target "_BuildJava" completely.
	  Output file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/bin/Release/lib/packs/Microsoft.Android.Sdk.Darwin/33.0.0/tools/java-source-utils.jar" does not exist.
	…
	17:54:19.564 59:12>Target "DispatchToInnerBuilds: (TargetId:1637)" in file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/bin/Release/dotnet/sdk/7.0.100-preview.7.22354.2/Microsoft.Common.CrossTargeting.targets" from project "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/external/Java.Interop/tools/java-source-utils/java-source-utils.csproj" (target "Build" depends on it):
	  Task "MSBuild" (TaskId:1099)
	    Task Parameter:BuildInParallel=True (TaskId:1099)
	    Task Parameter:Targets=Build (TaskId:1099)
	    Task Parameter:
	        Projects=
	            java-source-utils.csproj
	                    AdditionalProperties=TargetFramework=net7.0 (TaskId:1099)
	    Additional Properties for project "java-source-utils.csproj": (TaskId:1099)
	      TargetFramework=net7.0 (TaskId:1099)
	…
	17:54:19.592 59:12>Target "_BuildJava: (TargetId:1640)" in file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/external/Java.Interop/tools/java-source-utils/java-source-utils.targets" from project "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/external/Java.Interop/tools/java-source-utils/java-source-utils.csproj" (entry point):
	  Building target "_BuildJava" completely.
	  Output file "/Users/runner/work/1/s/xamarin-android/external/Java.Interop/../../bin/Release/lib/xamarin.android/xbuild/Xamarin/Android/java-source-utils.jar" does not exist.
	…
	17:54:41.034 59:11>Done building target "_BuildJava" in project "java-source-utils.csproj".: (TargetId:490)
 
What appears to be happening -- and there is lots of conjecture here,
as the build log is enormous and it's difficult to piece everything
together -- is that `java-source-utils.csproj` is built *twice*:
Once via `Xamarin.Android.sln`, and once via `apksigner.csproj`, as
it appears that setting `%(PackageReference.AdditionalProperties)`
triggers a *nested build*; note the `DispatchToInnerBuilds` target
which invokes the `<MSBuild/>` Task with the specified
`AdditionalProperties`.

However, that's not the only potential source of concurrent builds;
`java-source-utils.csproj` used `$(TargetFrameworks)` (plural), which
can *also* result in concurrent builds between the "outer" and "inner"
builds used as part of `$(TargetFrameworks)`.

Fix this problem by bumping to dotnet/java-interop@c942ab68, which
updates `java-source-utils.csproj` to use the singular
`$(TargetFramework)` property -- avoiding "outer" and "inner" build
problems -- and "for good measure" update `apksigner.csproj` to
remove `%(ProjectReference.AdditionalProperties)` on
`java-source-utils.csproj`.  This should ensure that
`java-source-utils.csproj` is only built *once*, which in turn should
ensure that `java-source-utils.jar` isn't corrupted, and our CI
builds become more reliable
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 4, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
full-mono-integration-build For PRs; run a full build (~6-10h for mono bumps), not the faster PR subset (~2h for mono bumps)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants