Skip to content

[release/3.1] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore dotnet/aspnetcore-tooling #18363

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 15, 2020

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/efcore

  • Subscription: 94910a9f-24ae-4376-fb11-08d794a352c5
  • Build: 20200114.5
  • Date Produced: 1/15/2020 1:21 AM
  • Commit: 6cf5ee68c68e0d8eaaa929e04bfbfaf97314791a
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/3.1
  • Updates:
    • Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer -> 3.1.2
    • dotnet-ef -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite -> 3.1.2

From https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore-tooling

  • Subscription: 5eda9ad6-6b49-4d8c-ace3-08d7842ce357
  • Build: 20200115.8
  • Date Produced: 1/16/2020 12:29 AM
  • Commit: 18bfc128c07023e9384697fba876df575238dba9
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/3.1
  • Updates:
    • Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Razor.Extensions -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.AspNetCore.Razor.Language -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Razor -> 3.1.2
    • Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor -> 3.1.2

…114.5

- Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer - 3.1.2
- dotnet-ef - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite - 3.1.2
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot requested a review from dougbu as a code owner January 15, 2020 20:27
@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 15, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

…build 20200114.7

- Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Razor.Extensions - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.AspNetCore.Razor.Language - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Razor - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor - 3.1.2
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot changed the title [release/3.1] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore [release/3.1] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore dotnet/aspnetcore-tooling Jan 15, 2020
@wtgodbe
Copy link
Member

wtgodbe commented Jan 15, 2020

Template test failures look real:

Project new reactredux failed to publish.\r\nProcess exited with code 1\nStdErr: \nStdOut: Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 16.4.0+e901037fe for .NET Core\r\nCopyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.\r\n\r\nF:\workspace_work\1\s.dotnet\sdk\3.1.100\MSBuild.dll -maxcpucount -property:Configuration=Release -restore -target:Publish -verbosity:m /bl .\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.csproj\r\n Restore completed in 58.4 ms for F:\workspace_work\1\s\src\ProjectTemplates\test\bin\Release\netcoreapp3.1\TestTemplates\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.csproj.\r\nobj\Release\netcoreapp3.1\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.MvcApplicationPartsAssemblyInfo.cs(13,33): error CS0234: The type or namespace name 'Mvc' does not exist in the namespace 'Microsoft.AspNetCore' (are you missing an assembly reference?) [F:\workspace_work\1\s\src\ProjectTemplates\test\bin\Release\netcoreapp3.1\TestTemplates\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.csproj]\r\nobj\Release\netcoreapp3.1\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.MvcApplicationPartsAssemblyInfo.cs(14,33): error CS0234: The type or namespace name 'Mvc' does not exist in the namespace 'Microsoft.AspNetCore' (are you missing an assembly reference?) [F:\workspace_work\1\s\src\ProjectTemplates\test\bin\Release\netcoreapp3.1\TestTemplates\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.csproj]\r\nobj\Release\netcoreapp3.1\AspNet.reactredux.ehc2paudsjd.RazorAssemblyInfo.cs(13,33): error CS0234: The type or namespace name 'Mvc' does not exist in the namespace 'Microsoft.AspNetCore' (are you missing an assembly reference?)

@dougbu could you take a look?

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 15, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

@wtgodbe that problem isn't specific to this branch. suggest working backward through the rolling or official builds to see when it was introduced (today).

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@wtgodbe
Copy link
Member

wtgodbe commented Jan 16, 2020

First place I'm seeing it is in the internal build for #18357, but that PR had the template tests pass. Will take a closer look

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@wtgodbe
Copy link
Member

wtgodbe commented Jan 16, 2020

Also CC @JunTaoLuo in case anything stands out

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Linux Source Build), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: macOS 10.13), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Windows Server 2016 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux Musl x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux Musl ARM64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux ARM64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux ARM), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: macOS), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Windows ARM), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Windows x64/x86), aspnetcore-ci (Build Code check)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

…build 20200115.8

- Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Razor.Extensions - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.AspNetCore.Razor.Language - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Razor - 3.1.2
- Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor - 3.1.2
@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

@wtgodbe check the final commit that went in for #18357. The merge might have messed something up.

Note this problem affects PR validation as well. See for example the first round of validation for #17581

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Linux Source Build), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: macOS 10.13), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Windows Server 2016 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux Musl x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux Musl ARM64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux ARM64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux ARM), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: macOS), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Windows ARM), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Windows x64/x86), aspnetcore-ci (Build Code check)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

Suspect the templates problem is not specifically coming from #18357. If the previous official or rolling build succeeded, need to check all the commits merged between them (we don't run multiple builds of any branch in parallel).

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Linux Source Build), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: macOS 10.13), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Windows Server 2016 x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux Musl x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux Musl ARM64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux ARM64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux ARM), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Linux x64), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: macOS), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Windows ARM), aspnetcore-ci (Build Build: Windows x64/x86), aspnetcore-ci (Build Code check)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

Building all of the commits between the failing and successful official builds in #18371 ("dougbu/head-3") through #18379 ("dougbu/head-B"). Last one matches the successful build to eliminate an unexpected change in the agents or something we download the latest of.

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@JunTaoLuo
Copy link
Contributor

I may have cracked the enigma, see #18380

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@Pilchie
Copy link
Member

Pilchie commented Jan 16, 2020

👀

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Templates - Windows Server 2016 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

/azp run aspnetcore-ci

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

@JunTaoLuo many thanks -- you did indeed crack the enigma❕

FYI the problem was introduced in ee57a0c "Use checked-in platform manifest in 3.1.2 (#18250)" though it's not clear how that caused the test regressions. But, it's pretty clear because #18379 aka dougbu/head-B -- which went back all the way to 36e7902 "Merge pull request #18151 from dotnet/johluo/feb-branding", the last successful official build's commit -- was the only test build that avoided the many template test failures.

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Standard Merge Policies Unsuccessful checks: aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@JunTaoLuo
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think ee57a0c was the issue. It failed the build since it turned ref pack generation on. The underlying problem with how assemblies were resolved must have been silently introduced earlier.

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Waiting on checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jan 16, 2020

@JunTaoLuo your statement is slightly contradictory. That commit introduced the problem because it turned targeting and ref/ pack builds back on. But, I agree the root cause was deeper.

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 16, 2020

Auto-Merge Status

This pull request has not been merged because Maestro++ is waiting on the following merge policies.

  • Waiting on checks: aspnetcore-ci, aspnetcore-ci (Build Test: Ubuntu 16.04 x64)
  • ✔️ Standard Merge Policies Succeeded - No reviews have requested changes.

@wtgodbe wtgodbe merged commit 405e841 into release/3.1 Jan 16, 2020
@wtgodbe wtgodbe deleted the darc-release/3.1-4b1815ab-56f3-4565-b69f-efb55319e60d branch January 16, 2020 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants