Skip to content

If not waiting for data, allocate memory before flush #22201

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

benaadams
Copy link
Member

To reduce contention between reader and writer on the MemoryPool (as no-delay in the no wait scenario) seen in dotnet/runtime#36956 (comment)

@ghost ghost added the area-servers label May 25, 2020
@benaadams
Copy link
Member Author

@aspnet-hello benchmark json

@benaadams
Copy link
Member Author

Think this is broken and there are no tests for this scenerio :P

@benaadams benaadams closed this May 26, 2020
@amcasey amcasey added area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions and removed area-runtime labels Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants