Skip to content

Java client connection state part 1 #24166

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 24, 2020
Merged

Java client connection state part 1 #24166

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 24, 2020

Conversation

BrennanConroy
Copy link
Member

I'm limiting this change to just adding the CONNECTING state and modifying a couple things so it works as expected.

Part 2 will fix things like calling stop while in the middle of start, but I want to clean up the code a bit before doing that, so I'm planning on making a "clean up" PR before doing Part 2.

Easier to review if you turn off whitespace changes.

Progress towards #23291

@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy added the area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers label Jul 21, 2020
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy added this to the 5.0.0-rc1 milestone Jul 21, 2020
} else {
negotiate = tokenCompletable.andThen(Single.defer(() -> Single.just(new NegotiateResponse(baseUrl))));
}
hubConnectionState = HubConnectionState.CONNECTING;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should do verbose logging for each state transition.

// subscribe makes this a "hot" completable so this runs immediately
}).subscribeWith(start);
// subscribe makes this a "hot" completable so this runs immediately
}).subscribe(() -> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The CONNECTING->CONNECTED state transition is hidden in this diff, but we should assert the previous state where we can.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a PR that extracts this into a method, I'll add the logging though

// On start we're going to receive the handshake response and also an invocation in the same payload.
hubConnection.start();
mockTransport.getStartTask().timeout(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS).blockingAwait();
String sentMessage = handshakeMessageTask.timeout(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS).blockingGet();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do these short 1 second timeouts ever cause flakiness? If not, I'm impressed.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There were one or two flaky tests in java but I don't think they were ever related to these timeouts.

And actually, yesterday I was looking into them and there is a pretty good reason these never trigger. We can talk about it later today.

@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy changed the base branch from master to release/5.0 August 21, 2020 23:05
hubConnectionStateLock.lock();
try {
if (hubConnectionState != HubConnectionState.DISCONNECTED) {
logger.debug("Another start is in progress. Waiting for start to complete.");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The hub could be already-started here too, right? Maybe log the current state.

Copy link
Member

@halter73 halter73 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't love approving this without the changes to assert previous states and log state transitions, but I trust those are coming.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers tell-mode Indicates a PR which is being merged during tell-mode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants