Skip to content

Pin analyzers that ship in the SDK (#36690) #36754

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2021

Conversation

pranavkm
Copy link
Contributor

@pranavkm pranavkm commented Sep 20, 2021

  • Pin analyzers that ship in the SDK

Customer impact

ASP.NET Core produces a few analyzer assemblies that are shipped as part of the .NET SDK. These analyzers are added to web projects targeting 3.1 and newer.
In 6.0, we (unintentionally) bumped the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis that these projects referenced to a 4.0 version. This causes warnings when opening a 3.1 or 5.0 app in VS 2019 as it does not support these versions.

Additionally update the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.* packages used in tests, Razor, and framework analyzers that are only expected to run with VS 2020 to a more recent build. This is largely book-keeping, but allows us to write a test for file scoped namespaces.

Regression

The regression was introduced in 6.0-p7

Testing

Manually tested against a fresh VS 2019 install. Verified analyzers continue to work in 6.0 in apps that use newer C# features

Issue

Fixes #36552
Fixes #36736

* Pin analyzers that ship in the SDK

ASP.NET Core produces a few analyzer assemblies that are shipped as part of the .NET SDK. These analyzers are added to web projects targeting 3.1 and newer.
In 6.0, we (unintentionally) bumped the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis that these projects referenced to a 4.0 version. This causes warnings when opening
a 3.1 or 5.0 app in VS 2019 as it does not support these versions.

Additionally update the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.* packages used in tests, Razor, and framework analyzers that are only expected to run with VS 2020 to a more recent build. This is largely book-keeping, but allows us
to write a test for file scoped namespaces.

Fixes #36552
@pranavkm pranavkm requested review from dougbu, javiercn, Pilchie and a team as code owners September 20, 2021 18:24
@pranavkm pranavkm added the Servicing-consider Shiproom approval is required for the issue label Sep 20, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 20, 2021

"Hi pranavkm. Please make sure you've updated the PR description to use the Shiproom Template. Also, make sure this PR is not marked as a draft and is ready-to-merge.

To learn more about how to prepare a servicing PR click here.

@pranavkm pranavkm added Servicing-approved Shiproom has approved the issue and removed Servicing-consider Shiproom approval is required for the issue labels Sep 20, 2021
@pranavkm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dougbu this is good to go in.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Sep 20, 2021

@dougbu this is good to go in.

Needed an approval first 😺

@dougbu dougbu merged commit ba788d6 into release/6.0-rc2 Sep 20, 2021
@dougbu dougbu deleted the prkrishn/port-fix-rc2 branch September 20, 2021 20:59
dougbu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2021
* [release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore (#36635)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore

* [release/6.0-rc2] Handle JsonExceptions in RequestDelegateFactory (#36627)

* Handle JsonExceptions like InvalidDataExceptions in RequestDelegateFactory

* Don't catch InvalidDataExceptions when reading JSON

* [release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime dotnet/efcore (#36651)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime dotnet/efcore

* Avoid using invalid content type for ValidationProblemDetails (#36618)

Co-authored-by: Safia Abdalla <[email protected]>

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/efcore build 20210917.6 (#36667)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore

* Use a fake clock in the test (#36626)

Co-authored-by: Chris R <[email protected]>

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/runtime build 20210917.8 (#36675)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime

* [release/6.0-rc2] Throw for invalid TryParse and BindAsync (#36662)

* Backport of #36628 to release/6.0-rc2
* Throw for invalid TryParse and BindAsync
* nit
* use TypeNameHelper
* nit

Co-authored-by: Brennan <[email protected]>

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/efcore build 20210917.8 (#36681)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore

* Revert Enforce WebSockets Transport for Blazor (#36656)

* Revert Enforce WebSockets Transport for Blazor (changes introduced in #34644)
* Updated Release JS Files

* [release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime dotnet/efcore (#36687)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime dotnet/efcore

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/runtime build 20210917.25 (#36699)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/efcore build 20210917.18 (#36701)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore

* [release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore dotnet/runtime (#36706)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore dotnet/runtime

* [Release/6.0-rc2] Fix and test HttpSys delegation (#36698)

* Out of proc delegation tests
* Troubleshoot IsFeatureSupported
* Fix test
* Fix formatting
* Seperate tests
* Cleanup
* Fix SLN

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/efcore build 20210918.7 (#36715)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore

* Find inherited TryParse and BindAsync (#36694)

Co-authored-by: Brennan <[email protected]>

* [release/6.0-rc2] Use minimal APIs for F# project templates (#36660)

* [release/6.0-rc2] Retarget DOTNETHOME when installing x64 on ARM64 (#36695)

* Retarget DOTNETHOME when installing x64 on ARM64

* Make platform comparison case insenstive

* Address feedback

* Install x64 registry keys to different path on ARM64 machine

Co-authored-by: Eric StJohn <[email protected]>

* Pin analyzers that ship in the SDK (#36690) (#36754)

* Pin analyzers that ship in the SDK (#36690)

* Pin analyzers that ship in the SDK

ASP.NET Core produces a few analyzer assemblies that are shipped as part of the .NET SDK. These analyzers are added to web projects targeting 3.1 and newer.
In 6.0, we (unintentionally) bumped the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis that these projects referenced to a 4.0 version. This causes warnings when opening
a 3.1 or 5.0 app in VS 2019 as it does not support these versions.

Additionally update the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.* packages used in tests, Razor, and framework analyzers that are only expected to run with VS 2020 to a more recent build. This is largely book-keeping, but allows us
to write a test for file scoped namespaces.

Fixes #36552

* Apply suggestions from code review

* [release/6.0-rc2] Rename and consolidate  "DelegateEndpoint" types (#36578)

* Call AddEndpointsApiExplorer() in controllers Web API template (#36753)

- backport of #36752 to release/6.0-rc2

Co-authored-by: DamianEdwards <[email protected]>

* [release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore dotnet/runtime (#36769)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore dotnet/runtime

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/efcore build 20210920.20 (#36778)

[release/6.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <42748379+dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Halter <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Safia Abdalla <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chris R <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Brennan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tanay Parikh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chris Ross <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Eric StJohn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pranav K <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: DamianEdwards <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Servicing-approved Shiproom has approved the issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants