[workload] Fix the SDK band version and base the WBT on the sdk flow#107899
[workload] Fix the SDK band version and base the WBT on the sdk flow#107899lewing wants to merge 17 commits intodotnet:mainfrom
Conversation
|
hmm I'm not sure this works without some of the other changes from the NET10 PR |
It doesn't work with them either, I was trying to illustrate the problem in dotnet/sdk#43070 to @marcpopMSFT |
Just to make it more clear the SDK band version we're constructing right now in main is We might be able to reenable the multiple band logic and produce a |
|
Why can't you make it |
Trying again with a recent 10.0.100 sdk |
@marcpopMSFT current failure is that the alpha.2 SDK only has workload sets which breaks our test setup |
It has workload sets? You mean the baseline workload set is breaking the test setup somehow? CC @dsplaisted if that's the case to see if he has ideas on how we reversion in the workload set world. |
So far it was just expecting a directory that wasn't there. Hopefully I was just overly pessimistic, will see if I can get it working here. |
|
Any luck? What folder? Do we have an option of having wasm workloads broken for a short time in sdk so we can get the rest of the repo and net10 work working? |
I had to flow some updates from emsdk which is not fast (see dotnet/dnceng#4111 ) but I'm trying again now |
too late to change it? if it's going to be a continuous pain, perhaps take a hit now? |
| <!-- Required for running apps built with 9.0 sdk, but the sdk does | ||
| not yet support *running* with 9.0 sdk --> | ||
| <AdditionalSharedFrameworkToInstallArguments Include="-Version latest -Channel 8.0 -Quality daily" /> | ||
| <!-- Required for running apps built with 10.0 sdk, but the sdk does |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes in this file look good.
| if (!Directory.Exists(outputDir)) | ||
| { | ||
| Log.LogMessage($"Could not find {name} directory at {outputDir}. Creating it.."); | ||
| Directory.CreateDirectory(outputDir); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes in this file look good.
radical
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The workload task+installation specific changes LGTM 👍
|
I've merged what was remaining of this into #106599 which is farther along now |
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure |
No description provided.