-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
Liveness fix for struct enreg. #51851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5915,17 +5915,35 @@ void Lowering::CheckNode(Compiler* compiler, GenTree* node) | |
{ | ||
unsigned lclNum = node->AsLclVarCommon()->GetLclNum(); | ||
LclVarDsc* lclVar = &compiler->lvaTable[lclNum]; | ||
#ifdef DEBUG | ||
if (node->TypeIs(TYP_SIMD12)) | ||
{ | ||
assert(compiler->lvaIsFieldOfDependentlyPromotedStruct(lclVar) || (lclVar->lvSize() == 12)); | ||
} | ||
#endif // DEBUG | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
#endif // TARGET_64BIT | ||
#endif // SIMD | ||
|
||
case GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR: | ||
case GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR: | ||
{ | ||
const GenTreeLclVarCommon* lclVarAddr = node->AsLclVarCommon(); | ||
const LclVarDsc* varDsc = compiler->lvaGetDesc(lclVarAddr); | ||
if (((lclVarAddr->gtFlags & GTF_VAR_DEF) != 0) && varDsc->HasGCPtr()) | ||
{ | ||
// Emitter does not correctly handle live updates for LCL_VAR_ADDR | ||
// when they are not contained, for example, `STOREIND byref(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR not-contained)` | ||
// would generate: | ||
// add r1, sp, 48 // r1 contains address of a lclVar V01. | ||
// str r0, [r1] // a gc ref becomes live in V01, but emitter would not report it. | ||
// Make sure that we use uncontained address nodes only for variables | ||
// that will be marked as mustInit and will be alive throughout the whole block even when tracked. | ||
assert(lclVarAddr->isContained() || !varDsc->lvTracked || varTypeIsStruct(varDsc)); | ||
// TODO: support this assert for uses, see https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/51900. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
} | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
||
default: | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new logic doesn't take into account
varDsc->lvOnFrame
. Is that intentional?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question, if I add an assert like
if (mustInitThisVar) assert(varDsc->lvOnFrame);
it won't fail (x64 spmi) but it is a current implicit contract so we probably should not rely on it.I will return the condition, thank you.