docs: use generic 'ArviZ object' instead of 'DataTree' in user-facing docs - #25
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ing docs PR #21 added support for arviz <1.0 (InferenceData) alongside >=1.0 (DataTree). This change removes DataTree-specific language from all user-facing doc files so the phrasing works regardless of arviz version.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR #21 added support for arviz <1.0 (
InferenceData) alongside >=1.0 (DataTree). These seven user-facing doc locations still exclusively mentionedDataTreeas the container type, misleading users on older arviz.Changes: every
DataTreereference in user-facing docs is now generic —ArviZ,ArviZ object, orArviZ groupsas appropriate.Not touched: source docstrings (already explicit about both types), internal files (agent instructions, CI comments, tests).
See #21 for context.