Skip to content

add link to GCC mailing list thread confirming that binutils should not be configured with --with-sysroot=$EASYBUILD_SYSROOT when GCC is being configured like that #2215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ocaisa merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2020
Merged

add link to GCC mailing list thread confirming that binutils should not be configured with --with-sysroot=$EASYBUILD_SYSROOT when GCC is being configured like that #2215

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions easybuild/easyblocks/b/binutils.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ def configure_step(self):
# we should *not* use the value of the EasyBuild --sysroot configuration option here,
# since that leads to weird errors where the sysroot path is duplicated, like:
# /bin/ld.gold: error: cannot open /<sysroot>/<sysroot>/lib64/libc.so.6: No such file or directory
# (see also https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-help/2006-08/msg00212.html)
self.cfg.update('configopts', '--with-sysroot=/')

# build both static and shared libraries for recent binutils versions (default is only static)
Expand Down