Skip to content

Conversation

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in Slack and confirmed in pytorch/pytorch#44948 using those 2 is not officially tested and known to cause problems at least on POWER architectures

Hence the removal

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
taurusml17 - Linux RHEL 7.6, POWER, 8335-GTX, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/cc479cd44db9416b8832c041685e239b for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
taurusi5532.taurus.hrsk.tu-dresden.de - Linux RHEL 7.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/6b03133c380c7f31b4b015c1403c5fbc for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2020

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Flamefire commented Sep 23, 2020

The failures on Power seems to be caused by OpenMP using code and go away with reducing OMP_NUM_THREADS but I already do that... Strange, so I guess still a bit flaky even with only 4 OMP threads

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11322 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11322 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 7857

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 697299579 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2020

@Flamefire failing test on POWER?

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
taurusml21 - Linux RHEL 7.6, POWER, 8335-GTX, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/994335e389ecd40f77bacc15f9bc10f5 for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

🤷 Seems to work

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ec1808dba5d19e11042a9a8b34f59fdc for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2561.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (haswell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/31c91f40257783cfd7846f84a12239ef for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2020

Going in, thanks @Flamefire!

@boegel boegel merged commit fbed872 into easybuilders:develop Sep 23, 2020
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the pytorch1.4-remove-glog-gflags branch September 23, 2020 16:18
@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Sep 23, 2020

Test report by @lexming
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node157.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b9948bc5cd09fea992185c79272343b2 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3404.kirlia.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/1107eccdbb2d86e9b2f647a8f6eace59 for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants