Skip to content

fix download URL for UDUNITS 2.2.26 #12020

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2021

Conversation

pescobar
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
nuc.lan - Linux Fedora 32, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.8.7
See https://gist.github.com/8cfa94c1f525b4c3af9c4fa4950a46fa for a full test report.

@verdurin verdurin added this to the 4.x milestone Jan 25, 2021
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12020 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12020 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13693

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 767091509 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 55 (11 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-5 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/3b58fd26e952c4a66dd742f372562e9a for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, according to eb --from-pr 12020 --fetch --force-download

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso EB_ARGS="--fetch --force-download"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12020 EB_ARGS="--fetch --force-download" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12020 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13700

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 767285058 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 159 out of 170 (11 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-5 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/cb13ac8e8b9de85a9945791a4d409cd7 for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/f8212478e4219e4b2d9a7d7f3c5797c0 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @pescobar!

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta merged commit 6ce5ef6 into easybuilders:develop Jan 27, 2021
@boegel boegel changed the title fix download url for UDUNITS 2.2.26 fix download URL for UDUNITS 2.2.26 Feb 3, 2021
@SethosII
Copy link
Contributor

The new URL seems to be broken again? At least I can't find anything related to UDUNITS here: https://fossies.org/linux/privat/legacy/?

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 12, 2021

@SethosII Indeed, let's follow up on that via #11951...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants