Skip to content

Conversation

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)

…-gobff-2020b.eb, libFLAME-5.2.0-GCC-10.2.0.eb, make-4.3-GCC-10.2.0.eb, ScaLAPACK-2.1.0-gompi-2020b-bf.eb
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
ebvm.novalocal - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/da33bf4ca45fe457f073f772773bad63 for a full test report.

@boegelbot

This comment has been minimized.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Feb 4, 2021
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Feb 4, 2021

@SebastianAchilles to fix the failing test an exception should be added for ScaLAPACK with versionsuffix -bf in test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py (see test_conflicts)

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@smoors Thanks a lot for your help! I have just added the exception for ScaLAPACK with the versionsuffix -bf.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Feb 9, 2021

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12098 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12098 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13800

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 776122498 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8962338e856c7f7c9e2c046c0aa7b2aa for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added the update label Feb 11, 2021
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.3.3?) milestone Feb 11, 2021
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 11, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node3607.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/eccaa16e2c9c8515b9d83a23eee095e0 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 11, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node3136.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0d8fed9c14e5bd53519499be29f20976 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 11, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node2609.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/1bf301449e911aba4333ba0b312ffeb2 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 11, 2021

Going in, thanks @SebastianAchilles!

@boegel boegel merged commit 6f92c9f into easybuilders:develop Feb 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants