add alternative checksum for Siesta-4.1-MaX-1.0

[smoors]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[boegel]

Diff between old and new source tarball:

$ diff -r  siesta-MaX-1.0.old siesta-MaX-1.0
Only in siesta-MaX-1.0.old/Docs: release.sh
Only in siesta-MaX-1.0.old: .gitlab
Only in siesta-MaX-1.0.old/Obj: .gitignore
Only in siesta-MaX-1.0.old/Src/MatrixSwitch: .gitignore
Only in siesta-MaX-1.0.old/Src/ncdf: .gitignore

So agreed that both original and current tarball can be considered valid.

[verdurin]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14643 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14643 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 7596

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1003439853 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/2ed8d74a30a3c2ca9d67b71d4cbe1c80 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node2630.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/4a451b0c06ebae6a13c15a879e7d54a2 for a full test report.

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @smoors!