Skip to content

Conversation

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=15671 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15671 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 1295

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1153239490 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

branfosj commented Jun 12, 2022

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.8.5
See https://gist.github.com/0ad192429dae09bf8e12a503c6f32ccd for a full test report.

make[1]: execvp: printf: Argument list too long
make[1]: *** [tools/v8_gypfiles/v8_base_without_compiler.target.mk:985: /dev/shm/branfosj/build-up-Ubuntu20.04/nodejs/16.15.1/GCCcore-11.3.0/node-v16.15.1/out/Release/obj.target/tools/v8_gypfiles/libv8_base_without_compiler.a] Error 127

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

boegelbot commented Jun 12, 2022

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/1a6b9ce67204ac1ae47e868261277f42 for a full test report.

== 2022-06-12 17:56:04,833 build_log.py:169 ERROR EasyBuild crashed with an error (at easybuild/easybuild-framework/easybuild/base/exceptions.py:124 in __init__): cmd "ldd /project/60006/boegelbot/Rocky8/zen2/software/nodejs/16.15.1-GCCcore-11.3.0/bin/node" exited with exit code 1 and output:
	not a dynamic executable

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u08b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/377624fe0b423b277bfd5469806c6fb4 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=15671 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15671 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8703

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1153249247 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@branfosj branfosj marked this pull request as draft June 12, 2022 18:18
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8587dbc1df33c2543b97b483882cf6e7 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles added this to the 4.x milestone Jun 13, 2022
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented Jun 13, 2022

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node117.pri.viking.alces.network - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/230d2368cfffe2e006c2a516b65a09ee for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

== 2022-06-12 17:56:04,833 build_log.py:169 ERROR EasyBuild crashed with an error (at easybuild/easybuild-framework/easybuild/base/exceptions.py:124 in __init__): cmd "ldd /project/60006/boegelbot/Rocky8/zen2/software/nodejs/16.15.1-GCCcore-11.3.0/bin/node" exited with exit code 1 and output:
	not a dynamic executable

This looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817111 - i.e. ldd exits with a failure if the item being checked is too big and this results in a false positive.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 23, 2022

== 2022-06-12 17:56:04,833 build_log.py:169 ERROR EasyBuild crashed with an error (at easybuild/easybuild-framework/easybuild/base/exceptions.py:124 in __init__): cmd "ldd /project/60006/boegelbot/Rocky8/zen2/software/nodejs/16.15.1-GCCcore-11.3.0/bin/node" exited with exit code 1 and output:
	not a dynamic executable

This looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817111 - i.e. ldd exits with a failure if the item being checked is too big and this results in a false positive.

That tells me we should relax things a bit in framework, and take into account that ldd may fail on some binaries, which is essentially beyond our control...
See easybuilders/easybuild-framework#4033

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=15671 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15671 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8770

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1165255360 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 24, 2022

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3138.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e1a840599f0073814fe552a92b337c53 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/3bc6dc6e8c1c8ca4291c9309eccc6e85 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 24, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=15671 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15671 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 1330

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1165361149 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/03743533c80c8290b8bc98c23b45ea07 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.5.6?) Jun 24, 2022
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 24, 2022

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@boegel boegel merged commit 40c0af2 into easybuilders:develop Jun 24, 2022
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20220612182225_new_pr_nodejs16151 branch June 24, 2022 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants