Skip to content

Conversation

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

@lexming lexming commented Oct 26, 2022

(created using eb --new-pr)

Depends on:

@lexming lexming added the new label Oct 26, 2022
@lexming lexming force-pushed the 20221026122047_new_pr_IJulia1233 branch from 70faa60 to 1f1ddd3 Compare October 26, 2022 10:55
@lexming lexming added this to the 4.x milestone Oct 26, 2022
@lexming lexming mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2022
2 tasks
@lexming
Copy link
Contributor Author

lexming commented Oct 27, 2022

Test report by @lexming
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
login2.cerberus.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6126 CPU @ 2.60GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b84b13ee72bd88e3d3a40e2eb69e3e89 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor Author

lexming commented Oct 27, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16494 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16494 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9398

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1294005027 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0694d159d080790de02403a2dab14d11 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor Author

lexming commented Nov 10, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16494 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16494 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9496

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1310418918 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0aaf31d44df79e5700cbca1b2f7b9413 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 15, 2022

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3139.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/bcd08093751cf3707b71dcb37e00e5fc for a full test report.

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.6.3?) Nov 15, 2022
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 15, 2022

Going in, thanks @lexming!

@boegel boegel merged commit 4019c3a into easybuilders:develop Nov 15, 2022
@boegel boegel changed the title {lib}[system/system] IJulia v1.23.3 {lib}[system/system] IJulia v1.23.3 w/ Julia 1.6.7 Nov 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants