-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 772
stick to older PyQt-builder in easyconfig for PyQt5 5.15.5, so that 'pip check' passes #16703
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stick to older PyQt-builder in easyconfig for PyQt5 5.15.5, so that 'pip check' passes #16703
Conversation
…pip check' passes
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 1323948625 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @jfgrimm |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
jfgrimm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
|
How is this working, since SIP 5.5.0 is hard-coded to not support Python 3.10 ? For my own build, I had to patch this file to change it to 10 to get Python 3.10 to work. |
|
@mboisson Please open an issue on that, it's impossible to follow up on things in merged PRs... |
|
ok, done |
(created using
eb --new-pr)Without this change,
pip checkfails with:That's problematic when installing stuff on top of
PyQt5, like theQtPy-2.3.0-GCCcore-11.3.0.ebI'm looking into.