Skip to content

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Feb 16, 2023

(created using eb --new-pr)

partial fix for #17162 (other ELPA easyconfigs also need changed homepage)

no change in checksums

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 16, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--sourcepath /tmp/$USER/pr17357 --force-download --stop source"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17357 EB_ARGS="--sourcepath /tmp/$USER/pr17357 --force-download --stop source" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17357 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10254

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1432815738 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 31 out of 35 (15 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/a17d13cbb3161cc5ec4c981bcfb75eca for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

@boegel from a quick look it appears the failures relate to the older Intel toolchains, and can probably be ignored?

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="ELPA-2020.11.001-foss-2020b.eb ELPA-2020.11.001-intel-2020b.eb"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17357 EB_ARGS="ELPA-2020.11.001-foss-2020b.eb ELPA-2020.11.001-intel-2020b.eb" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17357 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10272

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1435529084 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/309ee4857ba3758b5d6066ffb665aa6b for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Those rebuilds were for missing modules while testing #17359

Copy link
Contributor

@Micket Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented Feb 26, 2023

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@Micket Micket merged commit 8eda6d9 into easybuilders:develop Feb 26, 2023
@boegel boegel deleted the 20230216104608_new_pr_ELPA201711001 branch February 26, 2023 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants