Skip to content

Conversation

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)

…e-13.2.0.eb, libopus-1.5.2-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb, libsndfile-1.2.2-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb, libvorbis-1.3.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb
@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03b - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/be171f75ec9d97a7d6c147fa9699a98f for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 25, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20893 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20893 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13810

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2188488534 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 25, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bob-Latitude-5300 - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8665U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/4c31a2bbbf257b0a78d8c5404a035800 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 25, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (5 easyconfigs in total)
interactive1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/d528eb2d20480310f296242393c0c2fb for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/0359a1e542ef38ead60ef58d5bad26af for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 25, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@bedroge bedroge added this to the release after 4.9.2 milestone Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20893 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20893 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4455

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2188512550 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/6332cbb95c4360ebadec143651f392ff for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 25, 2024

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@bedroge bedroge merged commit cb0783a into easybuilders:develop Jun 25, 2024
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240625100905_new_pr_FLAC143 branch June 25, 2024 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants