Skip to content

Conversation

@hajgato
Copy link
Collaborator

@hajgato hajgato commented Feb 24, 2016

Depends on #2549 (xextproto)

@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6569/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel boegel added this to the v2.7.0 milestone Mar 1, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ebb1fbe299768612ace9 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/424b1c212bb1482b45ea for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

Jenkins: test this please

1 similar comment
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

Jenkins: test this please

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

Jenkins: test this please

1 similar comment
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

Jenkins: test this please

@boegel boegel merged commit a9b4c90 into easybuilders:develop Mar 1, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 1, 2016

merged via #2605, thanks @hajgato!

@boegel boegel changed the title {vis}[intel-2016b] libXfixes 5.0.1 (REVIEW) {vis}[intel-2016ba libXfixes 5.0.1 (REVIEW) Mar 16, 2016
@boegel boegel changed the title {vis}[intel-2016ba libXfixes 5.0.1 (REVIEW) {vis}[intel-2016a] libXfixes 5.0.1 (REVIEW) Mar 16, 2016
@hajgato hajgato deleted the libXfixes2016a branch June 8, 2017 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants