Skip to content

[CUDA] Add power9 support to CUDA 10.1 ECs #9442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
boegel merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2019
Merged

[CUDA] Add power9 support to CUDA 10.1 ECs #9442

boegel merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2019

Conversation

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

@Flamefire Flamefire commented Dec 4, 2019 •
edited
Loading

(created using eb --new-pr)

Note: ECs using icc are not updated because icc does not support Power9

@Flamefire Flamefire force-pushed the 20191204174916_new_pr_CUDA101105 branch from fc0dd5b to 1215e71 Compare December 5, 2019 08:26
@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Flamefire commented Dec 5, 2019

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
taurusml2 - Linux RHEL 7.6, 8335-GTX, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/5bc19933ec1539c25e1b7a8cbd500e12 for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Flamefire commented Dec 5, 2019

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
taurusi6492.taurus.hrsk.tu-dresden.de - Linux RHEL 7.4, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/5bad7f76353c7c53be104a40810fbc55 for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Flamefire commented Dec 5, 2019

Requires easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#1871 for Power9 tests

Ccing @boegel

@boegel boegel added this to the release after 4.1.0 (4.1.1?) milestone Dec 10, 2019
boegel
boegel approved these changes Dec 10, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 10, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3131.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/35bce2c058c1e22f1c567bd35bcdd290 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 10, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2409.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/202c874c35da986c71470c0b05440104 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 10, 2019

Going in, thanks @Flamefire!

@boegel boegel merged commit fb9ed79 into easybuilders:develop Dec 10, 2019
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the 20191204174916_new_pr_CUDA101105 branch December 11, 2019 08:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@boegel boegel boegel approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

enhancement

Projects

None yet

Milestone

4.1.1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Flamefire @boegel