Skip to content

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Dec 15, 2019

(created using eb --new-pr)
requires #9508 (makedepend), #9506 (g2lib,g2clib), #9505 (HDF), #9512 (GDAL), #9507 (UDUNITS), #9513 (ESMF), #9514 (cairo)

@boegel boegel added the update label Dec 15, 2019
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Dec 15, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 15, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3152.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/c77e089bfa22475b86d7da2efd4fba30 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 15, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2407.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/4cfabdc208824c5eca492e306697c516 for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

closing and reopening to trigger tests

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v4 @ 2.00GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/6c7347ef02d69d7fe77bea8493a37922 for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jan 4, 2020
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jan 4, 2020
@boegel boegel requested a review from smoors January 4, 2020 22:13
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 5, 2020

Test report by @smoors
FAILED
Build succeeded for 19 out of 23 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node377.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/fb3000713953bff15fdef17c39cdee18 for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 6, 2020

build error for g2lib:

gfortran -c -O2 -ftree-vectorize -march=native -fno-math-errno -fno-range-check -I. jpcunpack.f
ar  -ruv libg2.a jpcunpack.o
a - jpcunpack.o
rm -f jpcunpack.o
gcc -c -O2 -ftree-vectorize -march=native -fno-math-errno -DLINUXG95 -D__64BIT__ enc_jpeg2000.c
enc_jpeg2000.c:4:10: fatal error: jasper/jasper.h: No such file or directory
 #include "jasper/jasper.h"
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 6, 2020

this is odd.
g2lib-3.1.0 builds fine with GCCcore-8.2.0 but fails with GCCcore-8.3.0

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 7, 2020

@smoors Looks like this could be caused by the bug introduced in easybuilders/easybuild-framework#3145?
Does the JasPer module with GCCcore/.8.3.0 still update $CPATH?

easybuilders/easybuild-framework#3152 will fix that issue...

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 7, 2020

this is odd.
g2lib-3.1.0 builds fine with GCCcore-8.2.0 but fails with GCCcore-8.3.0

fix in easybuilders/easybuild-framework#3145 is merged, please update easybuild-framework to latest develop, do a forced reinstall of JasPer (so the module updates $CPATH), and try again...

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 9, 2020

Test report by @smoors
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 22 out of 22 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node374.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/5a7aacdfe68f2bfdb800a7070a1f90eb for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@smoors smoors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@smoors smoors modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.1.1) Jan 9, 2020
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 9, 2020

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@smoors smoors merged commit ecd1e01 into easybuilders:develop Jan 9, 2020
@boegel boegel deleted the 20191215100025_new_pr_NCL662 branch January 9, 2020 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants