Skip to content

feat: upgrade react to v18 #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

huniafatima-99
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR upgrades react to v18 under this epic.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 6, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14857311678

Details

  • 0 of 3 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 55.335%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/index.jsx 0 3 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10724312105: -0.1%
Covered Lines: 168
Relevant Lines: 306

💛 - Coveralls

</AppProvider>,
document.getElementById('root'),
rootNode.render(
<StrictMode>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good overall. I'm curious about the StrictMode component. Could you help me understand what it is and why it's necessary for the upgrade?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @michaelroytman, this is mentioned here in the roadmap.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@huniafatima-99 huniafatima-99 merged commit 954051f into master May 8, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants