Skip to content

[New Rule] Potential Malicious PowerShell Based on Alert Correlation #4635

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

w0rk3r
Copy link
Contributor

@w0rk3r w0rk3r commented Apr 16, 2025

Summary

Alert correlation-like rule that parses the script_block_id from the message field so we can alert when PowerShell scripts trigger multiple PowerShell rules.

Shorter description:
Identifies PowerShell script blocks associated with multiple distinct detections, indicating likely malicious behavior.

Sample Match

image

image

Copy link
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Apr 16, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential Malicious PowerShell Based on Alert Correlation (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

"OS: Windows",
"Use Case: Threat Detection",
"Tactic: Execution",
"Rule Type: Higher-Order Rule"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add investigation guide and tag

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I understood, investigation guides are only required for critical alerts, otherwise we should add them as part of the release prep.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I see. We are enforcing it for high too, I'll work on it

| KEEP kibana.alert.rule.name, powershell.file.script_block_id, _id

// Count distinct alerts and filter for matches above the threshold
| STATS distinct_alerts = COUNT_DISTINCT(kibana.alert.rule.name), rules_triggered = VALUES(kibana.alert.rule.name), alert_ids = VALUES(_id) BY powershell.file.script_block_id
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it optimal to aggregate on a specific user ID or host?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As these are like UUIDs, they are not likely to repeat between different hosts, so I think we don't need that - at least for now.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Apr 22, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential Malicious PowerShell Based on Alert Correlation (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Apr 22, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential Malicious PowerShell Based on Alert Correlation (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Apr 22, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential Malicious PowerShell Based on Alert Correlation (esql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@w0rk3r w0rk3r merged commit 1bab741 into main Apr 22, 2025
11 checks passed
@w0rk3r w0rk3r deleted the posh_higher branch April 22, 2025 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport: auto Domain: Endpoint OS: Windows windows related rules Rule: New Proposal for new rule
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants