[9.1] Updates 'model_id' and 'input_type' as required parameters for Cohere V2 #4896
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs. No changes detected. You can validate these APIs yourself by using the |
This is correct. Thanks @kosabogi |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2025
(cherry picked from commit a7876a8)
l-trotta
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
(cherry picked from commit a7876a8) Co-authored-by: kosabogi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the
model_idandinput_typeparameters to be required for the Cohere V2 inference endpoint starting from 9.1.I also removed the default value for
model_id, assuming that it no longer has one since it's now required. @davidkyle could you please confirm if this assumption is correct?