You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This pull request addresses a missing board definition for the Twin AIoT module in the boards.txt file, resolving a critical upload error. This change is to solve the error we received in the twinaiot module that we added in the previous PR.
Problem Description
When attempting to upload a sketch to the Twin AIoT board, the build and upload process failed due to a missing line in the board's configuration file. The specific error message received was:
No such command '{upload.flags}'
This error was caused by the absence of the upload.flags and upload.extra_flags parameters in the Twin AIoT Module definition. The Arduino IDE's build system, which uses the platform.txt template, was unable to correctly format the esptool.py command-line arguments without these keys, leading to a failed upload.
Solution
This pull request adds the following lines to the Twin AIoT Module definition in the boards.txt file:
This simple correction ensures that the build system can properly resolve the command-line arguments, allowing the firmware upload to proceed without errors.
Test Scenario
This change has been tested on the following hardware and software configuration:
Hardware: Twin AIoT Module (ESP32-S3-Mini-1 N4R2)
Software: Arduino IDE 2.3.6
Test: A simple "Blink" sketch was successfully compiled and uploaded, confirming that the upload process works as expected.
👋 Hello bekirr12, we appreciate your contribution to this project!
📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more. 🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project. Click to see more instructions ...
This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.
DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.
Please consider the following: - Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes. - Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues. - Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it. - To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.
Review and merge process you can expect ...
We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.
1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer. 2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications. 3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing. - At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation. 4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request addresses a missing board definition for the Twin AIoT module in the boards.txt file, resolving a critical upload error. This change is to solve the error we received in the twinaiot module that we added in the previous PR.
Problem Description
When attempting to upload a sketch to the Twin AIoT board, the build and upload process failed due to a missing line in the board's configuration file. The specific error message received was:
No such command '{upload.flags}'
This error was caused by the absence of the upload.flags and upload.extra_flags parameters in the Twin AIoT Module definition. The Arduino IDE's build system, which uses the platform.txt template, was unable to correctly format the esptool.py command-line arguments without these keys, leading to a failed upload.
Solution
This pull request adds the following lines to the Twin AIoT Module definition in the boards.txt file:
twinaiot.upload.flags=
twinaiot.upload.extra_flags=
This simple correction ensures that the build system can properly resolve the command-line arguments, allowing the firmware upload to proceed without errors.
Test Scenario
This change has been tested on the following hardware and software configuration:
Hardware: Twin AIoT Module (ESP32-S3-Mini-1 N4R2)
Software: Arduino IDE 2.3.6
Test: A simple "Blink" sketch was successfully compiled and uploaded, confirming that the upload process works as expected.