Skip to content

Update tests and example implementation for bowling #270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2016

Conversation

devonestes
Copy link
Contributor

There were some changes to the cannonical_data.json file for the bowling
exercise, so we needed to update our implementation to be consistent with the
rest of the exercises in Exercism.

This will be a breaking change for existing implementations, and there are just
flat out new requirements in the new cannonical_data, so I'm not 100% sure
how we want to handle that. I know it's still something we're discussing, and
I'd love to hear the input from other folks on the importance of keeping up to
date with the Exercism standard cannonical_data vs. not making breaking
changes.

Closes #269

@devonestes devonestes force-pushed the update-bowling-tests branch from 092b1d4 to a589920 Compare October 20, 2016 14:52
There were some changes to the `cannonical_data.json` file for the `bowling`
exercise, so we needed to update our implementation to be consistent with the
rest of the exercises in Exercism.

This will be a breaking change for existing implementations, and there are just
flat out new requirements in the new `cannonical_data`, so I'm not 100% sure
how we want to handle that. I know it's still something we're discussing, and
I'd love to hear the input from other folks on the importance of keeping up to
date with the Exercism standard `cannonical_data` vs. not making breaking
changes.

Closes exercism#269
@parkerl
Copy link
Contributor

parkerl commented Oct 20, 2016

@devonestes should we also update the test descriptions to match?

@devonestes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parkerl I updated all the description strings to match what was in the cannonical_data.json, so that should all be good.

Or did you mean something else and I just misunderstood you?

@parkerl
Copy link
Contributor

parkerl commented Oct 20, 2016

Great! That was what I meant. Thanks 🎉

@parkerl parkerl merged commit 92465d0 into exercism:master Oct 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants