You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To prevent any further questions, and leave notes for when we can or cannot potentially move to the travis: haskell model, we should document in the .travis.yml why it is the case that we do what we do, so that future people don't have to ask the same question I just asked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I submitted #121 to check why we do not use
travis: haskell
andghc:
to specify our GHC versions like https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/haskell suggests and instead we use https://github.com/hvr/multi-ghc-travis. The reason is travis doesn't yet support 7.10 and 8.0; that's a dealbreaker for me.To prevent any further questions, and leave notes for when we can or cannot potentially move to the
travis: haskell
model, we should document in the.travis.yml
why it is the case that we do what we do, so that future people don't have to ask the same question I just asked.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: