Skip to content

travis: Explain why we use hvr-ghc #127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2016
Merged

travis: Explain why we use hvr-ghc #127

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2016

Conversation

petertseng
Copy link
Member

I submitted #121 to try to see why we didn't use language: haskell.
I got my answer, and now it's a good idea to record why so that we will
know when we are able to re-evaluate our options.

Closes #123.

I submitted #121 to try to see why we didn't use `language: haskell`.
I got my answer, and now it's a good idea to record why so that we will
know when we are able to re-evaluate our options.

Closes #123.
@kytrinyx kytrinyx merged commit ef1b1e4 into exercism:master Apr 8, 2016
@petertseng petertseng deleted the travis-explain branch April 8, 2016 03:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants