-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
presenting clean package.yaml to students #420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
IMHO, the only reason to provide a
I haven't checked all of them yet. |
I removed all dependencies that where not used by the stub solutions or demanded by the test suites, but the process was far from automatic. 😫
|
Oops :< Oh well, at least we only have to do it this once, right? So this issue is closed now, right? |
Oh wait, you were doing that in #423. Okay, I'll leave it open until then. |
Coming in real quick to mark down a reference - this fixes a flaw first noted in #189 (comment) |
Since #396 we can move our examples to a separate directory with its own
package.yaml
to prevent showing students extra elements in dependencies inpackage.yaml
Here are the current exercises with non-empty dependencies.
It should be pretty easy to script the process of moving them all at once. The question before doing that: Are there any exercises where we should just keep the
package.yaml
as-is?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: