Skip to content

go-counting 1.0.0.3: Match new canonical data #665

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 18, 2018
Merged

go-counting 1.0.0.3: Match new canonical data #665

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 18, 2018

Conversation

petertseng
Copy link
Member

@petertseng petertseng commented Mar 18, 2018

jssander and others added 6 commits March 18, 2018 20:39
All implementing tracks have this function, but it is never mentioned.

exercism/problem-specifications#1195
I did not consider this to provide any additional value.

I asked for this to be removed in
exercism/problem-specifications#1195 (comment)
I requested this be added in
exercism/problem-specifications#1195 (review)

There was an implicit test of this in the 5x5 board, but we'll start
small.

Note that this track deliberately does not change `territories` to be a
map mapping a player to all of their territories, instead keeping it an
array of all separate contiguous regions. This is because I (as the
track maintainer) believe that keeping it an array provides better
fidelity of the board and helps ensure that implementations are doing
the right thing.
exercism/problem-specifications#1195

Note that this track deliberately does not change `territories` to be a
map mapping a player to all of their territories, instead keeping it an
array of all separate contiguous regions. This is because I (as the
track maintainer) believe that keeping it an array provides better
fidelity of the board and helps ensure that implementations are doing
the right thing.
@petertseng petertseng merged commit f9a14ba into exercism:master Mar 18, 2018
@petertseng petertseng deleted the go-counting branch March 18, 2018 21:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants