Skip to content

gigasecond: Deprecate exercise. #280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2016
Merged

gigasecond: Deprecate exercise. #280

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2016

Conversation

rbasso
Copy link
Contributor

@rbasso rbasso commented Sep 3, 2016

Closes #230.

@petertseng
Copy link
Member

Hi I could rubber-stamp 👍 this. Note! I'm taking your word for it that everyone's gigasecond submission is the same since I haven't done it and can't see the submissions. Thus, take anything I say with a grain of salt. And in case anyone sees this comment and asks, no, I don't really have time to look at gigasecond submissions so don't magically give me access to that.

Anyway, this is valid JSON so if nobody else has anything to say, what you say goes =D

@rbasso rbasso merged commit 655afe3 into exercism:master Sep 3, 2016
@rbasso rbasso deleted the deprecate-gigasecond branch September 3, 2016 10:31
sshine added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
resistor-color-duo was added in #808.

resistor-color-trio was added in #869.

Yet there is no resistor-color. I argue that there shouldn't be.

A reasonable solution might look like

```haskell
data Color = ...
  deriving (Eq, Enum, Bounded)

colorCode :: Color -> Int
colorCode = fromEnum

colors :: [Color]
colors = [minBound..]
```

which makes it approximately as simple as the gigasecond exercise which
was marked as deprecated in #280 (decision made in #230). Still, if it
is simply missing, it will appear as an exercise that is potentially
implementable on https://tracks.exercism.io/haskell/master/unimplemented

Since a question was raised about this exercise once, marking it as
foregone will limit further requests made in vain.
@sshine sshine mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants