Adding AutoCompleteBox extension for setting ItemTemplate #244
Conversation
h0lg
changed the title
|
I've just added a few commits - unrelated to the ItemTemplate setting, but not to the |
| static member inline itemTemplate(this: WidgetBuilder<'msg, #IFabAutoCompleteBox>, template: 'item -> WidgetBuilder<'msg, 'widget>) = | ||
| this.AddScalar(AutoCompleteBox.ItemTemplate.WithValue(WidgetHelpers.compileTemplate template)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this a good place to compile the builder (here named template) into a template? Or do I lose the ability to identify different builders for the equality comparison by doing so? I'm doing it here because I was unable to declare the ItemTemplate attribute value with the open generic signature of the builder.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No here. This is already done on WidgetHelpers.buildItems as part of the WidgetBuilder constructor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In a second look. It is ok to have compileTemplate as a separate function.
-
template: 'item -> WidgetBuilder<'msg, 'widget>will be passing'itemand then will be unboxed whenWidgetDataTemplateis building the template. -
One thing we can do is to use
#IFabControlinstead of'widget
| static member inline itemTemplate(this: WidgetBuilder<'msg, #IFabAutoCompleteBox>, template: 'item -> WidgetBuilder<'msg, 'widget>) = | ||
| this.AddScalar(AutoCompleteBox.ItemTemplate.WithValue(WidgetHelpers.compileTemplate template)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No here. This is already done on WidgetHelpers.buildItems as part of the WidgetBuilder constructor
h0lg
force-pushed
the
auto-complete/set-item-template
branch
from
ebd9f20 to
9bfb5c6
Compare
h0lg
force-pushed
the
auto-complete/set-item-template
branch
from
4fa1e6e to
37ac190
Compare
2 participants
Includes some clean up, refactoring and renaming in separate commits.
Please take a good hard look at my implementation of the
AutoCompleteBox.ItemTemplateattribute. It works - but I'm not at all certain whether I've used the correct of the many (sadly sparsely documented and hard to understand)Attributes.define*variants.Neither have I checked whether the attempted reference equality comparison works as intended with compiled template builders - because I'm not certain what the exact intent of the equality comparison is. My guess is to prevent unnecessary re-rendering? Either way, please have a closer look at that as well and test it - because I don't really know what to look out for beyond the working samples.