fix(bloc_test)!: forward _TestBlocObserver events to localObserver

[alestiago]

Status

READY

Breaking Changes

MAYBE YES

If the user was defining a Bloc.observer, now it will actually observe. Whereas before it would've been ignored.

Description

Before, only the localObserver will get notified of onError all other obvervables would be silenced.

Type of Change

• ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🧹 Code refactor
• ✅ Build configuration change
• 📝 Documentation
• 🗑️ Chore

[alestiago]

@felangel friendly ping requesting for a review

[felangel]

@alestiago thanks for the PR and sorry for the delay! I took a look and I'm just wondering if you can provide some context for why this change is necessary. blocTest should only be used for unit testing a single bloc so it should ideally not involve any BlocObservers. Testing a BlocObserver should be done in a separate test and shouldn't require blocTest. Let me know what you think and thanks again!