Skip to content

chore: Update FAC to beta #1263

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2021
Merged

chore: Update FAC to beta #1263

merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2021

Conversation

lahirumaramba
Copy link
Member

  • Update to beta
  • Add integration test for verify token api

@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba added the release:stage Stage a release candidate label May 10, 2021
@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba requested a review from hiranya911 May 10, 2021 16:21
@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba assigned weixifan and unassigned hiranya911 May 10, 2021
@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba requested review from weixifan and removed request for hiranya911 May 10, 2021 16:56
@@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ export class AppCheckApiClient {
*/
private toAppCheckToken(resp: HttpResponse): AppCheckToken {
const token = resp.data.attestationToken;
// `timeToLive` is a string with the suffix "s" preceded by the number of seconds,
// `ttl` is a string with the suffix "s" preceded by the number of seconds,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting -- unrelated to this review, the ttl is actually a textual representation of a Duration proto as per AIP-142 and the Duration documentation. The only downside is that parsing it via Duration might cost us an additional dependency.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. I think for Javascript (Node.js) we can parse the JSON by referring to the JSON Mapping section in the proto. Can confirm that the JS SDK follows the same approach.

@weixifan
Copy link

LGTM!

@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba merged commit 8ceef89 into lm-fac May 10, 2021
@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba deleted the lm-fac-beta branch May 10, 2021 19:34
lahirumaramba added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release:stage Stage a release candidate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants