Skip to content

Change the logic to save the code status leaving the user the ability to set the command#1032

Merged
GiulioRomualdi merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
code_status_command
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

Change the logic to save the code status leaving the user the ability to set the command#1032
GiulioRomualdi merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
code_status_command

Conversation

@GiulioRomualdi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@GiulioRomualdi GiulioRomualdi commented Apr 4, 2026

This PR gives teh final user the possibility to write the command to store the code status instead of hardcode the superbuild command.

This is usefull in case the repo is not installed via the superbuild (e.g., via conda)

<param name="port_prefix">/yarp-robot-logger</param>
<param name="log_text">true</param>
<param name="text_logging_subnames">("ergoCubGazeboV1/yarprobotinterface")</param>
<param name="log_code_status">true</param>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that this flag has been removed by mistake since the code to read it is still there. In general, I would prefer to keep it anyhow to facilitate the enabling/disabling of this functionality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes my fault! Let me add it again !

@GiulioRomualdi GiulioRomualdi merged commit 83b694d into master Apr 7, 2026
8 checks passed
@traversaro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ok no sorry, I did not noticed that there was auto-merge enabled, so my review effectively merged the PR, my bad. I think @S-Dafarra point is valid.

@GiulioRomualdi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Don't worry @traversaro I open a new PR

@GiulioRomualdi GiulioRomualdi deleted the code_status_command branch April 7, 2026 08:01
@S-Dafarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Don't worry @traversaro I open a new PR

It could be directly #1034

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants