Skip to content

Test for computation with topography. #1040

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

javoha
Copy link
Member

@javoha javoha commented May 31, 2025

Description

Added test to start tracking down why compute_at has high computation time. This test showcases it by comparing "normal" model computation time to topography computation time. @Deepprakash222, please add your examples here too.

Checklist

  • My code uses type hinting for function and method arguments and return values.
  • I have created tests which cover my code.
  • The test code either 1. demonstrates at least one valuable use case (e.g. integration tests)
    or 2. verifies that outputs are as expected for given inputs (e.g. unit tests).
  • New tests pass locally with my changes.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the gempy 3 Will come with the next major update label May 31, 2025
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented May 31, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Add gempy label" took an action on this PR • (05/31/25)

1 label was added to this PR based on Miguel de la Varga's automation.

@Leguark Leguark force-pushed the compute_at_compuation_time branch from 3f38a65 to 993927c Compare June 11, 2025 14:18
Copy link
Member

Leguark commented Jun 11, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@Leguark Leguark closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Blocked gempy 3 Will come with the next major update model computation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants