Errors in child server components aren't tracked

[qnten]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have checked for existing issues https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/issues
• I have reviewed the documentation https://docs.sentry.io/
• I am using the latest SDK release https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/releases

How do you use Sentry?

Sentry Saas (sentry.io)

Which SDK are you using?

@sentry/nextjs

SDK Version

8.9.2

Framework Version

Next.js canary, but same result using Next.js 14.2.4

Link to Sentry event

No response

SDK Setup

No response

Steps to Reproduce

1. Clone https://github.com/qnten/sentry-next-server-component-error-reproduction
2. Add sentry dsn strings to the 3 configs
3. Install, build and start using pnpm install && pnpm run build && pnpm run start
4. Visit http://localhost:3000/
5. Visit http://localhost:3000/error-in-page

Expected Result

Two errors should show up in sentry:

• This is an error in a component (thrown in component-with-error.tsx)
• This is a page level error (thrown in error-in-page/page.tsx)

Actual Result

Only the error thrown right in the root page component shows up.

[lforst]

I will take a look!

[lforst]

To give an update here: I think this is kind of a big oversight on our end, and Sentry should report these errors. However, when I tried to come up with a way to do so, I noticed that it is de facto impossible to do unless we completely parse and rewrite your AST, which as of now is too risky for us.

I had a quick convo with Vercel since I thought Next.js should support such a use-case and expose some kind of onError hook we can use to collect these errors. They mentioned that they have plans in the form of an internal RFC to add something along these lines but actual work hasn't started.

I also opened a PR in the Next.js repo which would technically allow us to track these errors: vercel/next.js#67064 It is a bit hacky but would serve as a temporary work-around. However, as it stands right now, there is no appetite to do something like this and they would like a more complete solution instead - which I respect.

For now, we can explain in our docs that nested RSC errors will not be collected, since I agree that this is very confusing. I am super surprised this didn't come up earlier, during development, and testing. I guess, I never tested this case and always only had 1 layer deep RSCs. I hope this makes sense and you understand. Thanks for reporting this!

[qnten]

@lforst thank you for confirming und investigating! seems like such a common use case. so think a warning in the docs would nice.

from my user point of view its definitely surprising that component nesting has anything to do with how errors are collected.