feat(tracing): Add tracestate header handling
#3945
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lobsterkatie
changed the title
tracestate header handling (#3909)tracestate header handling
size-limit report
|
kamilogorek
changed the title
tracestate header handlingtracestate header handling
This is the result of rebasing the feature branch for the initial implementation of `tracestate` header handling (which had grown very stale) on top of current `master`. That branch is going to get deleted, so for posterity, it included the following PRs (oldest -> newest): feat(tracing): Add dynamic sampling correlation context data to envelope header (#3062) chore(utils): Split browser/node compatibility utils into separate module (#3123) ref(tracing): Prework for initial `tracestate` implementation (#3242) feat(tracing): Add `tracestate` header to outgoing requests (#3092) ref(tracing): Rework tracestate internals to allow for third-party data (#3266) feat(tracing): Handle incoming tracestate data, allow for third-party data (#3275) chore(tracing): Various small fixes to first `tracestate` implementation (#3291) fix(tracing): Use `Request.headers.append` correctly (#3311) feat(tracing): Add user data to tracestate header (#3343) chore(various): Small fixes (#3368) fix(build): Prevent Node's `Buffer` module from being included in browser bundles (#3372) fix(tracing): Remove undefined tracestate data rather than setting it to `null` (#3373) More detail in the PR description.
lobsterkatie
force-pushed
the
kmclb-add-tracestate-header-handling
branch
from
6203d15 to
7f97434
Compare
|
This pull request has gone three weeks without activity. In another week, I will close it. But! If you comment or otherwise update it, I will reset the clock, and if you label it "A weed is but an unloved flower." ― Ella Wheeler Wilcox 🥀 |
Lms24
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2022
…sts (#5133) Adds the propagation of an "empty" baggage header. The word "empty" is however kind of misleading as the header is not necessarily empty. In order to comply with the baggage spec, as of this patch, we propagate incoming (3rd party) baggage to outgoing requests. The important part is that we actually add the `baggage` HTTP header to outgoing requests which is a breaking change in terms of CORS rules having to be adjusted. We don't yet add `sentry-` baggage entries to the propagated baggage. This will come in a follow up PR which does not necessarily have to be part of the initial v7 release as it is no longer a breaking change. Overall, this is heavily inspired from #3945 (thanks @lobsterkatie for doing the hard work) More specifically, this PR does the following things: 1. Extract incoming baggage headers and store them in the created transaction's metadata. Incoming baggage data is intercepted at: * Node SDK: TracingHandler * Serverless SDK: AWS wrapHandler * Serverless SDK: GCP wrapHttpFunction * Next.js: SDK makeWrappedReqHandler * Next.js: SDK withSentry * BrowserTracing Integration: by parsing the `<meta>` tags (analogously to the `sentry-trace` header) 2. Add the extracted baggage data to outgoing requests we instrument at: * Node SDK: HTTP integration * Tracing: instrumented Fetch and XHR callbacks Co-authored-by: Luca Forstner <[email protected]>
AbhiPrasad
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2022
…sts (#5133) Adds the propagation of an "empty" baggage header. The word "empty" is however kind of misleading as the header is not necessarily empty. In order to comply with the baggage spec, as of this patch, we propagate incoming (3rd party) baggage to outgoing requests. The important part is that we actually add the `baggage` HTTP header to outgoing requests which is a breaking change in terms of CORS rules having to be adjusted. We don't yet add `sentry-` baggage entries to the propagated baggage. This will come in a follow up PR which does not necessarily have to be part of the initial v7 release as it is no longer a breaking change. Overall, this is heavily inspired from #3945 (thanks @lobsterkatie for doing the hard work) More specifically, this PR does the following things: 1. Extract incoming baggage headers and store them in the created transaction's metadata. Incoming baggage data is intercepted at: * Node SDK: TracingHandler * Serverless SDK: AWS wrapHandler * Serverless SDK: GCP wrapHttpFunction * Next.js: SDK makeWrappedReqHandler * Next.js: SDK withSentry * BrowserTracing Integration: by parsing the `<meta>` tags (analogously to the `sentry-trace` header) 2. Add the extracted baggage data to outgoing requests we instrument at: * Node SDK: HTTP integration * Tracing: instrumented Fetch and XHR callbacks Co-authored-by: Luca Forstner <[email protected]>
|
Closing this, as it has been replaced by |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If we end up merging the dynamic sampling/tracestate branch in, this will be the PR to do it. More detail at that point.